<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diskeeper Pro Premier&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davehildebrand.com/2007/08/23/diskeeper-pro-premier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davehildebrand.com/2007/08/23/diskeeper-pro-premier/</link>
	<description>The IT Crowd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:08:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hildebrand.com &#187; Hot-Linking and .htaccess&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.davehildebrand.com/2007/08/23/diskeeper-pro-premier/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hildebrand.com &#187; Hot-Linking and .htaccess&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 06:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davehildebrand.com/233/?p=62#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] and what this back-link was about. It turned out to be some guy using an image I have posted in my Diskeeper review. I have been meaning to add hot-linking protection to the site. A quick Google search to find a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and what this back-link was about. It turned out to be some guy using an image I have posted in my Diskeeper review. I have been meaning to add hot-linking protection to the site. A quick Google search to find a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.davehildebrand.com/2007/08/23/diskeeper-pro-premier/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davehildebrand.com/233/?p=62#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Diskeeper is a great product and I am glad that they price the Home edition reasonably.  Most users are aware that they need anti-virus, anti-spyware, anti-adware and to have a firewall running, but few know that system performance can be helped by using a good defragmentation product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diskeeper is a great product and I am glad that they price the Home edition reasonably.  Most users are aware that they need anti-virus, anti-spyware, anti-adware and to have a firewall running, but few know that system performance can be helped by using a good defragmentation product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArcticCircle</title>
		<link>http://www.davehildebrand.com/2007/08/23/diskeeper-pro-premier/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>ArcticCircle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davehildebrand.com/233/?p=62#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Nice review of the Diskeeper defraggers. I have been using Diskeeper Pro for about 2 months now, and it has been doing a great job on my laptop. I left it on the automatic mode after performing a manual defrag and boot-time defrag. The automatic defrag kicks in only when the laptop is on AC power so it does not drain the battery either. Very happy with it so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review of the Diskeeper defraggers. I have been using Diskeeper Pro for about 2 months now, and it has been doing a great job on my laptop. I left it on the automatic mode after performing a manual defrag and boot-time defrag. The automatic defrag kicks in only when the laptop is on AC power so it does not drain the battery either. Very happy with it so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
